3 ms·
If they aren't worth minimum wage, they wouldn't get hired to begin with. If they are worth hiring, they are worth minimum wage, even with supervision. You get
by ggggtez 5y ago
If they aren't worth minimum wage, they wouldn't get hired to begin with.
If they are worth hiring, they are worth minimum wage, even with supervision. You get what you pay for. Pay more money if you want more competent workers.
- treeman79 5y agoThey may have some value working, but it may be very little. Feed the birds. A 5 minute job. Hour later they come back. You HAVE to go check because much of the time it’s screwed up and needs to be redone. Would never hire this person at minimum wage. High minimum wage eliminates many people from consideration.
- ggggtez 5y agoThis doesn't make sense. Consider right now, in the restaurant industry in the US. Resaurants are increasing their pay. These are for jobs like McDonalds. The kind of jobs that people always use to point out work that is trivial, and shouldn't be paid minimum wage... And yet, they are paying more than minimum wage. Why? Because McDonalds is a 143.8 billion dollar company. They aren't worth that much because they are running charity. They make that much money from selling fries. So even if you think that fry cook is stupid and has to have their work double checked, who cares? If they weren't there, then you couldn't sell the fries to begin with. And then how will you make 143.8 billion dollars? The simple fact that the company has such value should make it obvious that the frycook is producing more value than they are paid.