4 ms·
2) I guess we can debate how useful this is but surely it's strictly better than neutral, hence good? 3) Isn't it perhaps a useful way to provide a stimulus th
by gspr 5y ago
2) I guess we can debate how useful this is but surely it's strictly better than neutral, hence good?
3) Isn't it perhaps a useful way to provide a stimulus that people who already have enough cannot simply pile onto their hoarded supply?
4) I mean obviously we want to avoid money laundering.
- TheGigaChad 5y ago2 and 3 are net negatives, giving too much power to the leader of the country...bread and circuses in their prime example. 4 is debatable, but in general - bad, money laundering is what the BigBrother decides it is.
- gspr 5y agoVery conspiratorial of you. I, for one, would not like to discard the idea of a benevolent democratic government. Suit yourself.
- TheGigaChad 5y agoEnjoy the next 20 years then! I pray I will be alive when this system collapses.