3 ms·

So it's more like "Windows for Rust" rather than "Rust for Windows"...

• usrusr 5y ago
  It's still Rust for Windows, as in "this is what we need to make Rust an option for Windows development". Thankfully, it's not 2003 anymore when the tools involved would only run on the target OS unless written in Java or by RMS. Nobody wants to bother with the specifics of their build server environment.