5 ms·

The title is on point. I know a Q'er, they lack basic abilities for reasoning, evidence and instead of doing any sort of hard research they simply trust what th

The title is on point. I know a Q'er, they lack basic abilities for reasoning, evidence and instead of doing any sort of hard research they simply trust what their authority says. Which is quite literally a guy on YouTube whom fabricates information. And group chats filled with conspirators and scammers looking to take advantage of them (buying gold/silver at its highest price). We now have cults of information where people intentionally go against the truth because they believe otherwise. If they don't want something to be true they simply say it isn't and turn around pushing their conspiracy. They know they're doing it, but belief is stronger than fact. These individuals are a result of the western worlds terrible education, devout religion, 24/7 news networks being allowed to lie, and lack of action against forums like 8ch.

jl2718 5y ago
I know this one guy that disagrees with me, and I think he is very stupid. This is proof that everybody that disagrees with me is also very stupid and wrong. The problem is that the opinions that disagree with me are allowed to exist. Understand the word ‘solipsism’.
- devwastaken 5y ago
  Don't Strawman and generalize - provide an argument relative to this context, if not then the merit of your argument stops by simply changing the content. For example if we were to insert Hitler now your generalized argument looks ridiculous because of course the problem is that people agreed with Hitler. When a person's opinion is based on literal fabrication of information, based on soley on belief, and is irreconcilable with the truth, yes, the problem is absolutely with them and parties involved.
- shephardjhon 5y ago
  Its not just one or a few people that one guy disagrees. Sorry but the openion of a guy with no experience or professional degree in a field is not the same as people with 20+ years of experience and a phd. And the openion of a piedratician is not applicable to an epidimic as someone with years of experience in that field. Least of all, the openion of a politician is completely irrelevant to anything where they cannt back up their claims with expert sources.

jl2718 5y ago

I know this one guy that disagrees with me, and I think he is very stupid. This is proof that everybody that disagrees with me is also very stupid and wrong. The problem is that the opinions that disagree with me are allowed to exist. Understand the word ‘solipsism’.

devwastaken 5y ago
Don't Strawman and generalize - provide an argument relative to this context, if not then the merit of your argument stops by simply changing the content. For example if we were to insert Hitler now your generalized argument looks ridiculous because of course the problem is that people agreed with Hitler. When a person's opinion is based on literal fabrication of information, based on soley on belief, and is irreconcilable with the truth, yes, the problem is absolutely with them and parties involved.
shephardjhon 5y ago
Its not just one or a few people that one guy disagrees. Sorry but the openion of a guy with no experience or professional degree in a field is not the same as people with 20+ years of experience and a phd. And the openion of a piedratician is not applicable to an epidimic as someone with years of experience in that field. Least of all, the openion of a politician is completely irrelevant to anything where they cannt back up their claims with expert sources.