3 ms·
Dubious indeed. I gave Alacritty a really good shot, as I was super excited to have a faster terminal. But my entire experience was plagued with slowdowns -- hu
by xyzzy_plugh 6y ago
Dubious indeed. I gave Alacritty a really good shot, as I was super excited to have a faster terminal. But my entire experience was plagued with slowdowns -- huge latencies, cat'ing huge files was very slow. I spent tons of time trying to tune things to make it good but it just never got there.
Basically every other "simple" terminal I've found behaves better -- xterm, urxvt, konsole, even iTerm2.
I have no idea how they can claim "fastest".
- nemoden 6y agoI did quite a bit of testing of alacritty, kitty, iTerm2, and default macos terminal. Kitty shown best results even using test that alacritty is using (tree /) vim is faster in kitty (by perception), both when ran without multiplexor and inside tmux session
- Cloudef 6y agoalacritty is GPU accelerated terminal. It may not be faster depending on your setup. xterm is also one of the fastest software terminals out there.
- xyzzy_plugh 6y agoYeah but their slogan isn't "fastest terminal depending on your setup."