3 ms·
Conspiracy BS because it cherry picks ideas to support a conclusion. The implied conclusion is that Covid has been exaggerated to sell vaccines Cherry picking
by worik 6y ago
Conspiracy BS because it cherry picks ideas to support a conclusion.
The implied conclusion is that Covid has been exaggerated to sell vaccines
Cherry picking exapmple: "criticized GAVI for focussing on funding expensive new vaccines and neglecting to give children cheap old ones" Two minutes reading the article on Wiki tells me that the purpose of the organisation is to facilitate access to new vaccines, expensive patented ones. Access to non patented cheap vaccines does not need a group like this.
Hardly worth bothering about, but the question was asked. That is why "conspiracy BS"
- grumpyautist 6y agoSo, the study is funded by groups that admit to existing to sell new vaccines? And you don't see a conflict of interest?
- des1nderlase 6y agoThere could be conflict of interest, but someone still needs to show that these numbers are substantially wrong.
- grumpyautist 6y agoNo, the burden of proof is on the author. And considering this is a model, not a study, I wouldn't hold my breath on it.
- knowaveragejoe 6y agoThe burden of proof rests on your shoulders, in this case.