>The idea that a kind of forced toxicity can be a necessary protection to do good is worthy of a dystopian sci fi novel! I don't know if it's fair to call it f

>The idea that a kind of forced toxicity can be a necessary protection to do good is worthy of a dystopian sci fi novel! I don't know if it's fair to call it forced toxicity, so much as psuedo-toxicity; he's using it as red herring (or maybe a honeypot?) and following the rule: if you specifically want to be avoided by cancel culture... just get yourself cancelled :) That is, he's using the toxic word without the toxic meaning, to bypass shallow filters that lack the nuance to catch on. I'd say it's more of a kafkaesque bureaucratic distopia than a sci-fi one