3 ms·
I think the aim was more for supportability. I assume if you enjoy Scheme; you would like to write more of your language in Scheme and less of it in C. Although
by notriskfree 5y ago
I think the aim was more for supportability.
I assume if you enjoy Scheme; you would like to write more of your language in Scheme and less of it in C.
Although that is somewhat contradicted by the plans to create a new syntax for Racket going forward.
Chez Scheme by itself seems to be extremely fast.