4 ms·

I don't particularly want to argue with you. Using the phrase "falsifiable observation", and then referencing "fun" as an argument just doesn't really work for

I don't particularly want to argue with you. Using the phrase "falsifiable observation", and then referencing "fun" as an argument just doesn't really work for me. I appreciate that you like dynamic languages, but I will not take your "rest of the world" bait. To suggest that dynamic typesystems are as verifiably correct as static typesystems is verifiably incorrect.

fulafel 5y ago
Not sure if this needs clarifying or not from your message but: By falsifiable I meant that it's an observation that could be shown to be false, if it was false. So a concept from philosophy of science, not an assertion.
- void_mint 5y ago
  Your comment was reddit-level bait. This comment is also reddit-level bait. Enjoy your day.