4 ms·
Except they have no evidence for it, so I’m not sure why we should be bothered what they might “think”. There’s also little a priori reason to believe that mig
by addicted 5y ago
Except they have no evidence for it, so I’m not sure why we should be bothered what they might “think”.
There’s also little a priori reason to believe that might be true.
- roflc0ptic 5y agoI think there's a lot of a priori reason to believe that might be true. The phenomenon of vicarious traumatization points to a mechanism - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vicarious_traumatization#:~:text=Vicarious%20traumatization%20(VT)%20is%20a,to%20the%20client's%20traumatic%20material https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vicarious_traumatization#:~:te....
- username90 5y ago> There’s also little a priori reason to believe that might be true. What? You don't believe that constantly telling someone they are a victim during their entire childhood can make them feel like a victim? There are really no a priori reasons to believe that such a thing could be true? You could argue that there are little evidence for it, but you can't argue there are no a priori reasons for it being true. If I take a white kid and tell that white kid that he is a victim of black oppression, do you think that the kid will be more or less likely to feel like a victim of black oppression?