2 ms·
Which is still a lot less death and suffering than factory farming livestock produces. (Aside from the fact that growing cattle to eat requires a lot more acrea
by PhasmaFelis 5y ago
Which is still a lot less death and suffering than factory farming livestock produces. (Aside from the fact that growing cattle to eat requires a lot more acreage under cultivation--to feed the cattle--than growing plants to eat.)
It's impossible to feed people without causing some death. But that doesn't mean we can't work to minimize it.
- fastball 5y agoNot everywhere that can sustain cattle can grow crops fit for human consumption.