3 ms·
It's like saying, "The National Enquirer posted pictures of lizard people - we should inspect the evidence instead of jumping to conclusions based on the public
by papito 5y ago
It's like saying, "The National Enquirer posted pictures of lizard people - we should inspect the evidence instead of jumping to conclusions based on the publication's schlock reputation".
It's safe to take this shortcut. The burden of *overwhelming" proof is on the author.
- ALittleLight 5y agoThe pictures are posted by NASA and analyzed by this paper. Are you suggesting the photos are fake or altered? I'm also confused as to what evidence you would accept for proof of the claim that there are fungus-like things on Mars, if you don't accept pictures of them.