5 ms·
I am of the 20% I guess. My argument, which I can go into more (but only on demand: I believe I am shadowbanned so I need some proof otherwise before putting fo
by jimmygrapes 5y ago
I am of the 20% I guess. My argument, which I can go into more (but only on demand: I believe I am shadowbanned so I need some proof otherwise before putting forth such effort), is that the Net Neutrality advocates did not recognize that existing regulation already addresses the concerns.
- bigzyg33k 5y agoI don’t think you’re shadowbanned - at least, I can see your comment
- whateveracct 5y agoeveryone can lmao
- jjeaff 5y agoIf existing regulations already solved the issues, then you wouldn't see existing ISPs giving unlimited data as long as you are using their special pet services or partner services.
- jimmygrapes 5y agoBut not to the explicit exclusion of other data streams, which was the primary concern of most proponents. And the mechanisms for implicitly excluded providers does already exist for them to challenge any such exclusion, were it to be proven.
- jjeaff 5y agoThat wasn't the only concern. If you only give free data for certain services because they are a) already very popular or b) have enough money to pay for it, then you create a huge moat for the incumbents and make it much more difficult for any new, better alternatives to compete.
- yummypaint 5y agoYou are not shadowbanned, people probably just disagree with you