4 ms·
How is that fallacious? It's a direct response to the argument put forth in the comment he's replying to: > Ability to succeed doesn't really factor into what
by jonas21 5y ago
How is that fallacious? It's a direct response to the argument put forth in the comment he's replying to:
> Ability to succeed doesn't really factor into what was attempted. That is in the mind & intentions of those who were involved & instigated it.
- ineedasername 5y agoBecause the intent of the crowd was not to attack police, that was a byproduct. The intent was to disrupt the process whereby power is transferred from one leader to the other. The fallacy therefore is one of false equivalency.