3 ms·
The first 2 minutes of that video make it clear that they think it is "real" quantum effects (e.g. at 1:34 entanglement > EPR paradox > Bell's Theorem > local r
by infogulch 6y ago
The first 2 minutes of that video make it clear that they think it is "real" quantum effects (e.g. at 1:34 entanglement > EPR paradox > Bell's Theorem > local realism). Those are pretty quantum-y imo.
- tofof 6y agoYeah. At 9:34 they're dealing with entangled photons passing through 2 filters at different points in space, simultaneously. They affect each other, which is impossible without faster-than-light communication between them. This is absolutely quantum and cannot be explained at all by classical EM.
- andi999 6y agoIf you have entanglement then it is quantum. Yes. But the comment was you 'just' need polarized glasses. So if 'just' polarized glasses for a few $ means: "and of course a biphoton source for a couple of thousand $ and some coincidence counters for another couple of thousand $", then you only 'just' need polarizers.