3 ms·
You can't call someone questionable just based on the fact that his/her publications are different or his coauthor doesn't believe in X thing which is widely ac
by kushan2020 5y ago
You can't call someone questionable just based on the fact that his/her publications are different or his coauthor doesn't believe in X thing which is widely accepted. Science needs people to think out of the box and in an unorthodox way, and history is full of people who have done it and shed light on things we take for granted. I am also not saying that the author is credible, just saying you need more than that to call a persons work questionable.
- hyperbovine 5y ago> You can't call someone questionable just based the fact that his publications are questionable Still struggling with this...
- timmytokyo 5y agoThe primary and secondary authors are crackpots with a long history of pseudo-scientific, deceptive publication practices [1]. The first author also makes numerous claims that one of the reasons NASA fails to take him seriously is because NASA is full of Jews who can't believe in extraterrestrial life for religious reasons. [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9ZGcKA_Vk4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9ZGcKA_Vk4