4 ms·
I've been following this topic closely and it was never the case that there was a definitive explanation. There were many theories and counter theories. It wou
by stevenhuang 5y ago
I've been following this topic closely and it was never the case that there was a definitive explanation.
There were many theories and counter theories. It would be misleading to say the matter is settled.
It's also doubtful to propose this is a technology demonstration. The ability to track objects is not a differentiator; there are plenty videos online showing similar HUDs. In any case the public release has been degraded specifically to withhold information on their optical capabilities.
- sthnblllII 5y agoThat is simply not true. Here are the explanations for all three at a middle school level. There is literally nothing interesting in those videos and interpreting them as evidence as Extraterrestrial Aliens is simply inexcusable at this point. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jWWGmiZs4JA&pbjreload=101 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jWWGmiZs4JA&pbjreload=101
- stevenhuang 5y agoThose explanations are misguided and thunderfoot is just rehashing (badly) the points raised by Mike West. See commentary by David Fravor, one of the jet pilots in the incident https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aB8zcAttP1E&t=9671s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aB8zcAttP1E&t=9671s
- sthnblllII 5y agoDavid Fravor's testimony is contradicted by the video evidence. What specifically in Dr. Mason's analysis do you think is incorrect? Thanks.