3 ms·
I think the RISC-V Vector Extensions are very elegant. However, I'm more interested in what hard core practitioners think and the ones I follow are nonplussed.
by CalChris 5y ago
I think the RISC-V Vector Extensions are very elegant. However, I'm more interested in what hard core practitioners think and the ones I follow are nonplussed.
https://gist.github.com/erincandescent/8a10eeeea1918ee4f9d9982f7618ef68 https://gist.github.com/erincandescent/8a10eeeea1918ee4f9d99...
https://twitter.com/geofflangdale/status/1155122593369710592 https://twitter.com/geofflangdale/status/1155122593369710592
I'm reminded of a compliment for Vishy Anand's middlegame technique. He plays very well with the knight pair.
- jpfr 5y agoRISC-V really shines when the op-compression extension and macro-op fusion are taken into account. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25542963 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25542963 Many of the early critiques of RISC-V have not considered that. And many points become entirely moot in light of these techniques.
- brucehoult 5y agoHere’s the opinion of probably THE most important ARM engineer of the 1990s and 2000s, Dave Jaggar who developed the ARM7TDMI, Thumb, Thumb2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_6sh097Dk5k https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_6sh097Dk5k Check at 51:30 where he says (bringing up the topic of RISC-V himself) “I would Google RISC-V and find out all about it. They’ve done a fine instruction set, a fine job […] it’s the state of the art now for 32-bit general purpose instruction sets. And it’s got the 16-bit compressed stuff. So, yeah, learning about that, you’re learning from the best.”