> Paul Graham is indirectly talking about I find it strange that for someone that is a relatively immune from any real scrutiny, and constantly claiming to be

> Paul Graham is indirectly talking about I find it strange that for someone that is a relatively immune from any real scrutiny, and constantly claiming to be a bold thinker, PG is always so coy in his writing. I would find PG's recent stream of ego driven rants much more enjoyable and potentially insightful if he would just say what he's really trying to say. He might be trying to add strength to his arguments by making them somehow more general, but since these pieces always seem very clearly about a specific bone PG has to pick, the result is they read as some of the most cowardly essays I've ever encountered.