3 ms·
>> That founder naïveté, however, is also what often leads to founders winning I think you overstate your case with the word "often". It is far more often that
by skeeter2020 6y ago
>> That founder naïveté, however, is also what often leads to founders winning
I think you overstate your case with the word "often". It is far more often that what they're building never amounts to anything. Even the most successful founders typically bat less than 500
- borski 6y agoYou're right, but misread what I meant (and/or I was unclear!). I meant that when founders win it is often, at least partially, because they were naive when they started. I did not mean to imply all naive founders win; that would be absurd. :)