3 ms·
The framing of "just asking questions" as something insidious is insidious. People should be allowed to ask questions. It's only when they do that we get good
by slibhb 6y ago
The framing of "just asking questions" as something insidious is insidious.
People should be allowed to ask questions. It's only when they do that we get good answers. In the absence of dispute, everything, even a fact, is reduced to dogma.
These days J.S. Mill is often framed (by those arguing against free speech) as saying that "free speech leads to truth". But Mill was no fool and that was not his argument. From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_Liberty https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_Liberty:
> First, if any opinion is compelled to silence, that opinion may, for aught we can certainly know, be true. To deny this is to assume our own infallibility. Secondly, though the silenced opinion be an error, it may, and very commonly does, contain a portion of truth; and since the general or prevailing opinion on any subject is rarely or never the whole truth, it is only by the collision of adverse opinions that the remainder of the truth has any chance of being supplied. Thirdly, even if the received opinion be not only true, but the whole truth; unless it is suffered to be, and actually is, vigorously and earnestly contested, it will, by most of those who receive it, be held in the manner of a prejudice, with little comprehension or feeling of its rational grounds. And not only this, but, fourthly, the meaning of the doctrine itself will be in danger of being lost, or enfeebled, and deprived of its vital effect on the character and conduct: the dogma becoming a mere formal profession, inefficacious for good, but cumbering the ground, and preventing the growth of any real and heartfelt conviction, from reason or personal experience.
Mill says that, without disputation, we cannot get to truth. This is not the same as saying that disputation will always lead to truth. Mill also makes an important distinction (that we no longer recognize) between correct opinion and correct opinion that is rationally grounded.
- cortesoft 6y agoThe issue is when the "just asking questions" is asking the same question over and over again in discussions that the question isn't really relevant to. How many times do you have to answer the same question before you get to say "stop asking this question"?
- toiletfuneral 6y agoYeah I always thought that the “marketplace of ideas” meant some just weren’t worthwhile at all and shouldn’t be marketed anymore. (Flat earth, Phrenology etc.)
- legitster 6y agoThis is a bit like saying DDoS attacks are good because they harden security. Maybe that's true on a high level but if you are an administrator you should be allowed to try to reduce the number of DDoS attacks you get.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- throw0101a 6y ago"Just asking questions" can be a form of DoS: > Sealioning (also spelled sea-lioning and sea lioning) is a type of trolling or harassment that consists of pursuing people with persistent requests for evidence or repeated questions, while maintaining a pretense of civility and sincerity.[1][2][3][4] It may take the form of "incessant, bad-faith invitations to engage in debate".[5] * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning