4 ms·
I think Clubhouse is great in many ways. It’s initial rawness and authenticity and the lack of gatekeepers. They failed to come out with an Android version in o
by 1cvmask 6y ago
I think Clubhouse is great in many ways. It’s initial rawness and authenticity and the lack of gatekeepers. They failed to come out with an Android version in over a year after so much funding, and now in their iOS markets they are battling the return to normalcy with vaccinations and the opening up of societies.
- reidjs 6y agoI see the lack of an Android app as a feature. People who really want to use it will just get a cheap iPhone, I gave Android using friend my old iPhone 7. Most of the fun is the mix of exclusivity while still being able to chat with B-tier celebrities on a whim. Supporting Android means more users, which means we will have to sift through even more “Hodl BTC Gamestonk xD” rooms to get to the interesting rooms.
- meibo 6y agoIf your social network relies on having less users to be good, you might have a problem in your long-term business model(especially considering the funding they've already gotten).
- reidjs 6y agoHow is that not a viable business model? Who says every social network has to be for everybody?
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- diveanon 6y agoThis idiotic elitist mentality serves no one. You aren't special because you purchased a product made by the largest consumer product company on the planet.
- sv123 6y agoFunny, more users is exactly what they need.
- solosoyokaze 6y agoHow was there a lack of gatekeepers when it was literally invite only? Doesn't that mean it was only gatekeepers?
- ryanSrich 6y agoI wonder how CH users breakdown geographically in the US. Things here on the west coast, at least in Oregon, are very much not open at any normal capacity and won’t be for at least several more months, assuming no more spikes. I wouldn’t think they’d be seeing such a sharp decline in interest based on a few states allowing normal operations.