2 ms·
It’s not the $7.50 so much as the $7.50 extra for zero hours. So my calculus is “Would I rather make $300/week for zero hours worked or $600/week for 40 hours
by prepend 6y ago
It’s not the $7.50 so much as the $7.50 extra for zero hours.
So my calculus is “Would I rather make $300/week for zero hours worked or $600/week for 40 hours worked?”
So it’s not just a more money question, but a money vs time issue. It seems rational to me to prefer less money for no work. The problem is that it’s not sustainable as we’re adding debt to pay for it in the short term. This seemed important when work was impossible due to COVID, but now that we’re recovering it’s again possible to work.
Is there was a sustainable UBI plan to keep paying for this in the long term, that would be nice.