3 ms·
That is a fair point. Also for sites where JS is not required but is used to enhance interactivity a note to say that the difference is with/without JS would b
by dspillett 6y ago
That is a fair point.
Also for sites where JS is not required but is used to enhance interactivity a note to say that the difference is with/without JS would be useful ("without JS this site will work, but be slower due to more round-trips to the server" or "without JS this site will be less pretty") then you can choose if you care enough about the difference.