4 ms·
First this: 1plusV claims its sites were “blacklisted” by Google and lost most of their traffic over a period of several years, suffering “irreparable” harm t
by edw519 15y ago
First this:
1plusV claims its sites were “blacklisted” by Google and lost most of their traffic over a period of several years, suffering “irreparable” harm
then this:
Between 2007 and 2010 no less than 30 vertical search engines created by 1plusV were “black-listed”, some of which showed significant business potential.
By definition, a business that can suffer "irreparable harm" because of another entity's actions which are outside their control does not show "siginificant business potential".
- ehutch79 15y agowait. so these ARE search engines themselves? doesnt that mean they're competition? i'm sure google can argue that no law could possibly require preferential treatment of competitors? or something like that?
- anamax 15y ago> i'm sure google can argue that no law could possibly require preferential treatment of competitors? Google can argue that point, but it's not true.