>Their insistence on framing depression as if it were a biological illness (and not a result of the complex and historical interplay between psyche/desire and e

>Their insistence on framing depression as if it were a biological illness (and not a result of the complex and historical interplay between psyche/desire and environment) is repulsive to me. Feels like blatant propaganda to discuss depression as "merely" an economic problem, in "scientific" american no less. It's not one or the other. It's both, bio & environmental, like near-everything else.