Recently, I had a mole on the top of my foot about an inch or two from my toes that grew from a normal size small dot to bigger than a pencil eraser in the span

Recently, I had a mole on the top of my foot about an inch or two from my toes that grew from a normal size small dot to bigger than a pencil eraser in the span of two months. I went to the doctor, not suspecting any cancer, but because it was ANNOYINGLY itchy and started to grow a red ring around it. For context, I'm a nerdy software engineer who RARELY ventures outside of an air conditioned room, obviously no tanning or anything like that. When I got there, the doctor, who was a local UCSF-trained expert, suddenly looked very stressed out and started taking pictures of it. He kept insisting I get tested for deadly skin cancer (remember, melanoma is AGGRESSIVE) in a very roundabout way, but would not give any probabilities or anything like that. The more I asked questions, the less information he would give about what was going on, other than that I should get a biopsy RIGHT NOW in his office (he even told his other patients to wait a while). He numbed my foot with a shot, and then took the dermatology equivalent of an ice cream scooper and dug out a sizable chunk of my flesh. I was told I had to wait for two weeks for the results -- the most agonizingly stressful two weeks of my life -- hearing the news was less stressful. "We'll call you if there's any problems, if you don't get a phone call, nothing is wrong. See you at your next appointment!" The results were a rare "spitz nevus" precancerous mole that looks exactly like melanoma but is completely benign. I had won the lottery. The doctor took even more pictures the next time. So, to answer the article's question, no we are NOT screening too much for skin cancer; otherwise, I would have known to be in the doctor's office a LOT sooner. And I am a shut-in who does not sun bathe or even go outside for more than 30 minutes at a time on the occasional weekend...