I tried disabling Javascript and loading Facebook, and it recommended using the mobile version. Maybe it would be more feasible to merge "mobile" and "accessib

I tried disabling Javascript and loading Facebook, and it recommended using the mobile version. Maybe it would be more feasible to merge "mobile" and "accessible" versions into a unified interface? The issue with building a separate network is that it singles out people with disabilities, meaning they'll have less people to connect with, and would most likely feel ostracized. If accessibility is a big issue with current social networks, it's probably best solved like any other issue - get a lot of people talking about it and make sure the right people at Facebook (or any other company) are aware of exactly what needs to be changed. That said, are the mobile versions not adequately accessible? What sort of disabilities aren't being accounted for? We have screen readers, text magnification, tablets, touchscreen phones, desktop computers, laptops, braille terminals.. even Simple English Wikipedia. I'm sure there are plenty of edge cases, but some concrete examples would help the discussion.