>If you are concerned about reducing it further, western "baby subsidies" aren't a good place to start. Nowhere did I say the subsidies should be western. Nat

>If you are concerned about reducing it further, western "baby subsidies" aren't a good place to start. Nowhere did I say the subsidies should be western. Naturally the subsidies need to be global to affect the largest areas of population growth. This would have the added benefit of helping pull those in the poorest countries on earth out of dire poverty.