> Please point out where I asserted there are no issues with activist techniques. Refer to the comment I replied to where you argue "No one was calling anyone

> Please point out where I asserted there are no issues with activist techniques. Refer to the comment I replied to where you argue "No one was calling anyone a white supremecist", and then justified this conclusion by stating the social justice redefinition of the colloquial term: > No one was calling anyone a white supremecist in the conversation. They were likely talking about white supremacy as a cultural and political force in the context of how the policy could perpetrate it. To your other statement: > all I've done is point out that you constructed an arbitrary binary specifically to decry the creation of arbitrary binaries. There are many different types of individual viewpoints and behaviors, so a critique of or an unwillingness to accept a type of behavior normally means that you have tons of others you accept. Disagreeing being a binary choice is a social justice dogma that model the world very badly.