3 ms·
> it gets lost in the AVALANCHE of ill-considered laws California makes Citation needed, I think. It's not obviously true that California is particularly no
by ska 6y ago
> it gets lost in the AVALANCHE of ill-considered laws California makes
Citation needed, I think. It's not obviously true that California is particularly notable in this regard in terms of volume or fraction that are ill-considered. They of course have some notable unintended consequence problems, but that's not the same thing.
- sillyquiet 6y agoI think any glance at the legislative records of any session will prove this. Sure, the 'ill-considered' part is highly subjective, but I am not the only one that has that opinion, and that's my point - the people who would oppose a government regulating stuff points to California rightly or wrongly as a bad model because of high volume of relatively ineffective lawmaking.
- ska 6y agoA glance will prove out “AVALANCHE” ? Color me sceptical, I guess.
- sillyquiet 6y agoYes, it will, as in the sheer volume of passed legislation. No need to be skeptical. The below link will have to be filtered for the passed legislation, but as you can see, it's not a minor amount. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billSearchClient.xhtml?session_year=20212022&house=Both&author=All&lawCode=All https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billSearchClient.xh...
- ska 6y ago> Yes, it will, as in the sheer volume of passed legislation. But that wasn’t the claim. How do we see it is mostly ill conceived? Or indeed notable compared to similar populations ? I’m not saying you are wrong. I’m saying it doesn’t seem at all obvious.