If you think the Oversight Board is a sham, it's interesting to examine the individuals who choose to accept an invitation to serve on it. What drives these in

If you think the Oversight Board is a sham, it's interesting to examine the individuals who choose to accept an invitation to serve on it. What drives these individuals? Would they agree it's a sham - a "plausible deniability shield", or might they believe it is something more virtuously independent and efficacious? What does each individual gain or stand to achieve from their participation? What do the answers to these questions tell us about Facebook's power? What do the answers tell us about how society works?