3 ms·
Externally the basecamp saga seems dramatic. I think the explanation is a lot simpler. At the core though, they have a highly talented group of people that pro
by dghlsakjg 6y ago
Externally the basecamp saga seems dramatic. I think the explanation is a lot simpler.
At the core though, they have a highly talented group of people that probably won't have trouble finding a job in 6 months. If I was in that situation, and I agreed with the changes they made (I read Jason Fried's post, and mostly agree), I would still take the buyout!
6 months salary for me, or most engineers (or anyone, really) is A LOT of money. I like my job, and I've had lifestyle jobs that I absolutely LOVED. I can't say that I have ever loved a job so much that I would turn down that much money to leave.
If I was staying I would be pretty annoyed, the people that leave get a bag of cash, and the people that stay get to pick up the slack while their former colleagues get on twitter to dump on the company?
- ipaddr 6y agoIt would be hard staying because the workload just increased. They should give everyone who stayed 3/6 months pay.