7 ms·
True, but they exist in fewer numbers if you follow the male variability hypothesis. The argument is that there are not enough of them to model as their own gro
by meowkit 5y ago
True, but they exist in fewer numbers if you follow the male variability hypothesis. The argument is that there are not enough of them to model as their own group.
- awb 5y agoI don’t know why these groupings are important anyway, but the gap between the top 1% or women and bottom 50% is likely pretty noticeable. But maybe I’m confused as to the point of all this?