To me the obvious conclusion is that the production company puts no value on the wedding photography. I’m not sure how they could even structure a contract sin

To me the obvious conclusion is that the production company puts no value on the wedding photography. I’m not sure how they could even structure a contract since there is no consideration given to photographer. The photographer gives labor and rights to the photographs and the production company gives what exactly? That they might use the pictures in promotional material? If they must the pictures in promotional material that is consideration like product placement. But ambiguous amorphous exposure is not consideration. So you know, take the deal and forget to put in your memory card. Oops. Maybe they’ll learn a lesson.