4 ms·
Tbh I can understand the need for near complete blueprints: Trying to judge a systems safety, based on plans of only half the system, does not sound like it wou
by freeflight 5y ago
Tbh I can understand the need for near complete blueprints: Trying to judge a systems safety, based on plans of only half the system, does not sound like it would be a very useful judgement.
What's to prevent cutting massive corners after the original half plan was approved?
- DennisP 5y agoThey weren't asking for final approval at an earlier stage. They were just asking for feedback along the way. That way they wouldn't have to guess whether their basic idea had a chance, and they could make changes to address concerns before spending hundreds of millions nailing down the details on something the NRC could have told them it considered fundamentally flawed. It would also help them with investors, when they could show favorable early feedback.