4 ms·

Thanks for the feedback! Good to hear that you experienced good performance from PlayCanvas in your tests. The majority of PlayCanvas users to opt for the Edito

Thanks for the feedback! Good to hear that you experienced good performance from PlayCanvas in your tests. The majority of PlayCanvas users to opt for the Editor rather than using the Engine standalone, so yeah, the developer resources are biased a bit in that direction. But we are working hard to rebalance things towards the engine. For example, we're about to release a new engine-only examples browser app that's really cool. Key an eye out for it. :)

adenozine 5y ago
This seems really tone-deaf to me, to sorta market a mostly unrelated feature that's upcoming when a developer just decided against using your product for practical reasons. I suppose it's nice to know that you've at least acknowledged that there's an issue, but it seems weird to take so lightly someone using your product, finding it so difficult to deal with that they dropped it, and then even dropping an emoticon at the end. Just my two cents.
- ovenchips 5y ago
  No problem! Thanks for your feedback too. The examples browser is really designed to be a vehicle to learn and experiment with the engine run-time. It should be a great resource for engine-only developers - so hopefully the dvh will find it interesting. We've done a ton of work on the API reference recently too (https://developer.playcanvas.com/en/api/ https://developer.playcanvas.com/en/api/). It's a huge task, but yeah, we're working night and day to make the runtime easier to work with.
  - shkkmo 5y ago
    It seems like none of that work solves the underlying issue that was raised which was specifically search ambiguity between the library and the editor. Any response should discuss the possibility to changing the library name or creating search friendly alternative name (such the use of "golang" to alow easy searching for content related to the highly ambiguously searchable Go programming language.
    - ovenchips 5y ago
      I've kicked off a new forum thread on this topic: https://forum.playcanvas.com/t/improving-search-results-for-engine-only-developers/19981 https://forum.playcanvas.com/t/improving-search-results-for-... Excited to get peoples' thoughts on it.
- greshario 5y ago
  It's a marketing thing - the engine is free and open source, the editor is not.

adenozine 5y ago

This seems really tone-deaf to me, to sorta market a mostly unrelated feature that's upcoming when a developer just decided against using your product for practical reasons. I suppose it's nice to know that you've at least acknowledged that there's an issue, but it seems weird to take so lightly someone using your product, finding it so difficult to deal with that they dropped it, and then even dropping an emoticon at the end. Just my two cents.

ovenchips 5y ago
No problem! Thanks for your feedback too. The examples browser is really designed to be a vehicle to learn and experiment with the engine run-time. It should be a great resource for engine-only developers - so hopefully the dvh will find it interesting. We've done a ton of work on the API reference recently too (https://developer.playcanvas.com/en/api/ https://developer.playcanvas.com/en/api/). It's a huge task, but yeah, we're working night and day to make the runtime easier to work with.
- shkkmo 5y ago
  It seems like none of that work solves the underlying issue that was raised which was specifically search ambiguity between the library and the editor. Any response should discuss the possibility to changing the library name or creating search friendly alternative name (such the use of "golang" to alow easy searching for content related to the highly ambiguously searchable Go programming language.
  - ovenchips 5y ago
    I've kicked off a new forum thread on this topic: https://forum.playcanvas.com/t/improving-search-results-for-engine-only-developers/19981 https://forum.playcanvas.com/t/improving-search-results-for-... Excited to get peoples' thoughts on it.
greshario 5y ago
It's a marketing thing - the engine is free and open source, the editor is not.