3 ms·
>you respond by quoting free speech case law. No, I didn't. You are making this up to win an argument. There is no reference to case law or SCOTUS whatsoever
by SantalBlush 5y ago
>you respond by quoting free speech case law.
No, I didn't. You are making this up to win an argument. There is no reference to case law or SCOTUS whatsoever in my comment. What a bizarre fabrication. I see there is clearly no point in continuing this if you're going to argue in such bad faith.
Moreover, a response you deem "inappropriate" is subjective. Either your free speech is being denied or it isn't. My boss can fire me for saying a lot of things they don't like; that doesn't infringe on my right to free speech. This is the way it has always been.
- vxNsr 5y agoAgain we’re not having a legal argument before a judge here. You keep saying things about what your boss or someone else can or can’t do. That’s specifically not the discussion: you quoted the part of the OPs comment that called out the inappropriate behavior many like to engage in and agreed that it was wrong, but questioned its relevance to our discussion, it’s relevant bec many ppl don’t see it as inappropriate. Whether or not it’s legal is an entirely different discussion.
- SantalBlush 5y agoNo, what I am saying is that you do not get to personally dictate what behavior qualifies as harassment or bullying and then conclude that you are being deprived of your free speech. That is what you are trying to do here, and it is nonsense. Just because you feel outnumbered does not mean you are being harassed or bullied. If I swear at a customer and they complain to my boss, that does not mean I'm being harassed or bullied. How utterly childish.
- vxNsr 5y ago> being bullied, death threats, mob harassment etc are not acceptable responses to ideas or opinions you don’t like. Soo in your opinion this is ok? I’m so confused...