4 ms·
I think that depends on the type of VC or the particular partner at the VC. Especially the ones that invest in later stage rounds and enterprise software compan
by 1cvmask 6y ago
I think that depends on the type of VC or the particular partner at the VC. Especially the ones that invest in later stage rounds and enterprise software companies. They don’t appreciate flip flops and hoodies. I think it is always best to err on the side of “conservatism” if you want to raise money. Obviously there are many VCs who talk openly about their regrets in missing out on rocketships like Facebook because of Mark Zuckerbergs arrogance.
He did the famous Sequoia pitch in pajamas:
https://www.businessinsider.com/mark-zuckerbergs-brutal-prank-on-sequoia-2010-5 https://www.businessinsider.com/mark-zuckerbergs-brutal-pran...
Stuart Ellman the VC talking about Mark Zuckerbergs arrogance and why they skipped investing in Facebook:
https://www.businessinsider.com/15-people-missing-out-on-millions-2014-3#vc-stuart-ellman-met-marc-zuckerberg-by-phone-but-missed-out-on-investing-in-facebook-6 https://www.businessinsider.com/15-people-missing-out-on-mil...
- tyingq 6y agoIt just doesn't seem to have any benefit for the VC, to me. It's not really an indicator of anything useful. They wouldn't have scheduled the meeting if the meaningful stuff wasn't more important than flip-flops.
- Nasrudith 6y agoWow talk about projection. They fail big time at their job after engaging in petty gatekeeping and then declare in a goddamn high publication count article the investment arrogant? The employee who rejected J. K. Rowling's Sorcerer's stone manuscript for being too long didn't try to say it was her fault for making it too long and that is why the company missed out on the first billion dollar author.