4 ms·
Well, for starters they wouldn't be able to claim HIPAA or PCI-DSS compliance anymore. Anyone dealing with health information of Americans would expose themsel
by amalcon 5y ago
Well, for starters they wouldn't be able to claim HIPAA or PCI-DSS compliance anymore. Anyone dealing with health information of Americans would expose themselves to criminal charges if they ever use AWS again. Though it's a private sector response, Visa/MasterCard/etc would also push anyone dealing with credit card numbers off of AWS.
At least PCI-DSS certification (I don't know about HIPAA) further involves annual audits to make sure that certain proactive things are being done as well, specifically including things like data access logs. Those audits aren't as comprehensive as they ought to be, but they'd catch something egregious like marketing people looking into data owned by AWS customers.
I'm pretty sure (though much less than the above) that this would also be a de facto GDPR violation, meaning that nobody who wants to do business in Europe could safely use AWS anymore either. Amazon itself uses AWS and wants to do business in Europe, so that's a pretty good incentive.
- ForHackernews 5y agoMany years ago, I went through a PCI-DSS compliance "audit" at a previous company. The audit was carried out by some third party whose job it is to sign off on those things. We had to deliberately downgrade certain software to "approved" older versions and temporarily close some ports while they ran their scanning utility on our servers. After they rubber-stamped it, we re-upgraded and enabled whatever we needed to run again. They certainly would not have been able to detect if data center technicians (this was pre-cloud) were accessing our data behind our back. Maybe some companies take the PCI certification process more seriously than my previous employer did.