6 ms·
My relatively uninformed hunch is that, per hour of time expended, YC is not nearly as profitable as traditional venture capital. YC probably gets a much better
by time_management 18y ago
My relatively uninformed hunch is that, per hour of time expended, YC is not nearly as profitable as traditional venture capital. YC probably gets a much better nominal return-on-investment, but a more modest return-on-effort. YC has to provide mentoring in addition to capital, which means that there's an inherent bottleneck in the amount of business it can do.
I suspect Paul Graham is running Y Combinator not because he wants to maximize his profits, but because he enjoys mentoring bright young entrepreneurs. So although his return-on-effort is lower than it would be in traditional VC, this isn't problematic, because the utility of said effort is positive, and YC is presumably more than profitable enough.
- pg 18y agoHow we'll do compared to VC funds is a hard question to answer because of the huge variation in their performance. The median VC fund actually loses money. I hope we do better than that. It's true that we're not doing YC mainly for money, though. But we're not doing it just for fun either. The main thing that drives us, I think, is that it seems an interesting hack.