3 ms·
Do we have proof that they had performance problems? At least in Python you can write a C extension for a problematic code path which would probably take much l
by aeyes 5y ago
Do we have proof that they had performance problems? At least in Python you can write a C extension for a problematic code path which would probably take much less time.
I think what they are looking for is to reduce the amount of machines they need. Which in the end is more money in their pockets. Making the website faster for the end user is a welcome side effect.
- zerkten 5y agoThere are articles like https://instagram-engineering.com/dismissing-python-garbage-collection-at-instagram-4dca40b29172 https://instagram-engineering.com/dismissing-python-garbage-... which seem to confirm some problems. One of the people involved with this Cinder project was an original author of https://github.com/microsoft/Pyjion https://github.com/microsoft/Pyjion (it's now being revamped by a new dev.) Dino had deep .NET/CLR implementation experience and had been the lead for IronPython which I think spawned the interest in perf improvements through Cinder. I hope this effort is more successful for him.