3 ms·
You are assuming that people would know that your ad account on FB will only get banned when they have some "rejected ads". I, for once, learned that from your
by necovek 6y ago
You are assuming that people would know that your ad account on FB will only get banned when they have some "rejected ads". I, for once, learned that from your comments here.
You seem to be familiar with FB's terminology and UI, which most of the people are not. That's not on the people, but instead on FB to fix.
Sure, Signal is not doing themselves any favour by jumping the gun, but there is no reason to defend FB's UI when it can be higely improved too.
- NoPicklez 6y agoI’m not assuming that at all, that is my point and I’m not familiar with FB’s terminology nor have I ever used their ad platform. However Signal have said on Twitter that their ads were rejected and the screenshots show that they weren’t. My point is that Signal have jumped the gun and made some serious claims against Facebook when their account may have simply been deactivated for any number of reasons. There is no evidence based on the images provided to show that FB deactivated the account because they didn’t agree with the campaign. Now that doesn’t mean that isn’t the case, but it’s a big overstep by Signal to then go and assume that. I could setup an ad account tomorrow and and run a campaign and find that the account has been deactivated. Do I then assume that it is deactivated because FB didn’t like my platform? Do I create a blog post and share it on Twitter also assuming it was because FB didn’t like my campaign? No, I investigate and if it comes out that I wasn’t in compliance with their policy that may or may not be easily interpreted, then I write the posts. Until then all you know and all you’ve shown the public is that your account was deactivated for some reason.