> One of my teachers even showed to the class that he was able to view the screen of a student who was absent from class, without the student's knowledge. Isn'

> One of my teachers even showed to the class that he was able to view the screen of a student who was absent from class, without the student's knowledge. Isn't the fig leaf of "it's stated in the ToS that the user read and understood" the only reason such software is legal? Once you admit the student has no knowledge of it, how is it different than the RAT stalkerware people go to jail for?