3 ms·
It's quite the opposite - it's a fool's errand harboring fragile employees who are willing to make such a show about a email containing juvenile name calling. Y
by sol_invictus 5y ago
It's quite the opposite - it's a fool's errand harboring fragile employees who are willing to make such a show about a email containing juvenile name calling. You cannot build a solid baseline on an employee who can implode any second on the most miniscule issue.
This will hurt Basecamp in the immediate term but over time they will be better off.
- philosopher1234 5y agoThis comes off as though you didn't even read the comment you're replying to. I don't see how you can, in good faith, frame their point as "the most miniscule issue".
- simondotau 5y agoWithin the context of Basecamp internal company chat, demands that employees must prove they're not A Bad Person by repeating an particular string of words (as though that would prove anything anyway) is an incredibly minuscule issue indeed.
- philosopher1234 5y agoHow is this related to the GP comment?
- simondotau 5y agoIt sounds like the two of us have different ideas about what the GGP referred to as the issue when they said "You cannot build a solid baseline on an employee who can implode any second on the most miniscule issue." I'll leave it to the GGP to clarify.
- sol_invictus 5y agoLets try it the other way around - convince me that the issue at hand isn’t way overblown. I promise to try to be as objective as possible.
- philosopher1234 5y agoThats what the original comment did, and you neglected all of their points.
- MisterBastahrd 5y agoRead some of his other comments. It's not a coincidence that he pops up whenever there is a thread involving race on this site.
- sol_invictus 5y agoI went through my last comments page and maybe one of them involved ”race.” Why dont you go spread your disinformation elsewhere
- luxuryballs 5y agoif true perhaps it’s just something he has a strong opinion about, doesn’t indicate anything bad