3 ms·
i fear a lot of our data will be lost, in particular digital data. it's already getting difficult to access data in formats/form-factors from within a single l
by officialjunk 5y ago
i fear a lot of our data will be lost, in particular digital data. it's already getting difficult to access data in formats/form-factors from within a single lifetime. from the decay of the magnetization to the details of encoding.
- WalterBright 5y agoEven if 99.9% is lost, that still leaves behind far more than we have about the Romans. I recall an hour-long history program on TV where a whole narrative was concocted out of the engraving of a gladiator's name on a stone.
- Karrot_Kream 5y ago> Even if 99.9% is lost, that still leaves behind far more than we have about the Romans. Indeed, and due to complex historical factors, we have much more Roman writing than we have writing from other civilizations. It's important to remember that there are entire swathes of history and entire regions from where we have no actual history, only circumstantial writing by other peoples such as trading partners.
- thaumasiotes 5y ago> and due to complex historical factors, we have much more Roman writing than we have writing from other civilizations. Most other civilizations, yes, but Mesopotamia is beating Rome hands down for availability of writing.
- fapjacks 5y agoIf you think decay of magnetization is the limiting factor to digital longevity, I'm sorry to report that intentional bitrot will destroy any hope of retrieval long before the spinning platters fail. I'd suggest an experiment: Think of some major news event you can remember from even 10 years ago, find a news story about it online, and then just follow the links contained therein. Not only is Google shaping what you can see, but so is everyone else. God bless the Internet Archive.