3 ms·
The whole business about "top players getting more resources" is driving me a bit wild; as if there's an epidemic of "Chads each getting multiple Staceys" (in i
by glangdale 5y ago
The whole business about "top players getting more resources" is driving me a bit wild; as if there's an epidemic of "Chads each getting multiple Staceys" (in incel-speak). What seems to be more likely - based on the age charts in TFA - is that at the margins (excluding the large portion of people married or partnered relatively quickly and stably) there tends to be an age gap among those playing the fields.
Early 20 year old men might want women their age, but those women have a dating pool that includes men from age 20-35, and so on.
- CRConrad 5y agoAnd then when you look at the other end of the age distribution in those diagrams, you have a lot of women over 65 going without, AFAICS mainly because the older men they've partnered with are dead already. Technically / logically / mathematically, the solution seems blindingly obvious: Women as a group could help not only (younger) men as a group, but themselves (later in life) too, simply by selecting their partners more from their own age range.
- Viliam1234 5y agoTechnically, 20 year old men could also date women over 65.
- CRConrad 5y agoSure. But that would require women over 65 to date 20-year-old men. Idunno...