6 ms·
Banning the application could be justifiable (don't know the details), but removing everyones user photos just because they were uploaded with a certain tool, w
by wladimir 15y ago
Banning the application could be justifiable (don't know the details), but removing everyones user photos just because they were uploaded with a certain tool, wow, that's messed up. I simply don't have words for it.
- FlowerPower 15y agoFacebook is a walled in garden, they wont let outsiders benefit on their backs. Any app which recieves fame is due for "accidents".
- arcs 15y agoContent from spammy apps are hidden when the app is disabled. If you think about this it sort of makes sense: if the app is sending lots of crap without user consent, merely disabling an app does not remove all the crap it has already sent out. I don't think the posted content are actually deleted though, they should be unhidden when the app is unblocked.
- dendory 15y agoIf you've been following the recent threads, Facebook has recently started targeting tons of photo apps, often for no visible reason, and many think it's because Facebook is about to get into the game themselves with their own photo sharing apps. Expect an answer within the month or so when they release it.
- nl 15y agoIt's likely that the tool (or - more precisely - the app id & secret) let people upload pictures into other people's accounts. Facebook couldn't let that stand.
- r00fus 15y agoJust deleting photos without a proper explanation of why you did so leaves a very bad taste in the mouth. I can see why people would be bitter... FB just deleted their photos because their upload method was "wrong". If they said there was no possible way to examine the situation, or that they would restore your photos if you waded through an indemnification click-through, then OK, I can understand. But just deleting the photos with no warning or even notification?