3 ms·
or cheap, vs the cost of running someone down.
by epanchin 5y ago
or cheap, vs the cost of running someone down.
- sokoloff 5y agoABS does not significantly shorten stopping distances. It does provide improved steering control during brake applications that would otherwise exceed available traction, but I think it's extremely rare that ABS would be the difference between a pedestrian collision vs not. (They could just as easily choose a car that didn't have ABS as originally equipped and no one would say anything about the omission.)
- cnasc 5y ago> They could just as easily choose a car that didn't have ABS as originally equipped and no one would say anything about the omission. That’s the kind of failure case I wish fancy electronics had. Component breaks = now you’re driving a lower trim-level. As opposed to $5000 touchscreen module dies and now you can’t use the car.
- alliao 5y agoyou do realise the point of things breaking is so that people would be coerced to make a new purchase...
- _hyn3 5y agoIt does in skid conditions by detecting the slippage and releasing and reapplying the brake far faster than you could alone.
- h4waii 5y agoBeing able to control the vehicle during emergency braking would ostensibly allow you to steer around the obstacle or pedestrian prior to impact.