4 ms·
" ... because crossing the border is not a constitutional right." Yes, it is. "In Nguyen v. INS (2001), on a separate matter of citizenship, the Supreme Court
by rsync 5y ago
" ... because crossing the border is not a constitutional right."
Yes, it is.
"In Nguyen v. INS (2001), on a separate matter of citizenship, the Supreme Court put down, in writing, that citizens of the US have the absolute right to enter its borders. It was in recent times more or less presumed to be the case, though historically there have been a wide range of decisions that did deny entry by citizens, mainly by denying the underlying citizenship. This right extends to lawful permanent residents, so long as they maintain their status."[1]
[1] https://www.quora.com/Can-a-U-S-citizen-be-denied-entry-into-the-United-States https://www.quora.com/Can-a-U-S-citizen-be-denied-entry-into...
- toss1 5y agoGood point I should have said 'crossing the border without being searched is not a constitutional right' I can't cite chapter and verse, but I'm pretty sure that you do effectively consent to search in the act of crossing the border -- if you don't want to be searched for controlled or taxed items, you can choose to not cross the border, so...